Search
On the issue of MONMSG: Operating Systems
Obicn
On the issue of MONMSG
I always think that can be ignored any MONMSG CPF0000 error
However, I found that the deletion of JRNRCV time, if the backup JRNRCV never been the case,
CPA7025 will be reported, although I am in the CLP can be used MONMSG CPF0000 was still CPA7025 interruption, even if I WRKRPYLE, the automatic response is to visit, and why? ?
The other is the backup, in a backup after the phrase I used MONMSG CPF0000 are, but also at the MSG CPF3777, I just hope that regardless of the mistakes are not any interruption, as long as the SPLF LOG wrote in a can This is why? ?
In the end how much MSG is not MONITOR? ? ? : Em14:: em06:
I always think that can be ignored any MONMSG CPF0000 error
However, I found that the deletion of JRNRCV time, if the backup JRNRCV never been the case,
CPA7025 will be reported, although I am in the CLP can be used MONMSG CPF0000 was still CPA7025 interruption, even if I WRKRPYLE, the automatic response is to visit, and why? ?
The other is the backup, in a backup after the phrase I used MONMSG CPF0000 are, but also at the MSG CPF3777, I just hope that regardless of the mistakes are not any interruption, as long as the SPLF LOG wrote in a can This is why? ?
In the end how much MSG is not MONITOR? ? ? : Em14:: em06:
Qingzhou back in :2004-10 - 14 11:06:48 | [Quote: 78fd6d0b0e = "xuguopeng "]......... | In the end how much MSG is not MONITOR? ? ? [/ Quote: 78fd6d0b0e] : Em06:: em06:: em06: 1. > WRKRPYLE orders including the use of the environment must also be consistent. So ...... Hope to understand what I mean. 2. "I just hope that regardless of the mistakes are not any interruption, as long as the SPLF LOG wrote as can be ..." to do so if the data backup unsuccessful meaningful? Silver.lake back in :2004-10 - 14 11:19:51 | CPF0000> Xuguopeng back in :2004-10 - 14 13:11:13 | 3Q 3Q received ~ | I use because there is a backup in the LIB is PM400 ACTIVE he is the backup there may be incomplete, and I in a separate SAV LIB this time, if there is a successful OBJ no SAV, the MSG will be issued CPF3777, although I SAVLIB statement After already spent MONMSG CPF0000 Qingzhou back in :2004-10 - 14 14:39:20 | By SAVLIB LIB (PM400) DEV (TAP01) SAVACT (* LIB) try ...... | Xuguopeng back in :2004-10 - 14 15:01:56 | This is originally written in the election even if the * LIB may not have all the SAVE | Qingzhou back in :2004-10 - 14 15:55:55 | PM400 is a Shawanyi? | Xuguopeng back in :2004-10 - 14 15:58:49 | PM400 performance management is used, which can automatically collect performance data IBM will these performance data in PDF format of the report is very good free | Qingzhou back in :2004-10 - 14 16:04:58 | [Quote: d61232de46 = "xuguopeng"] PM400 performance management is used, which can automatically collect performance data IBM will these performance data in PDF format of the report is very good free [/ quote: d61232de46] | TU, as you say I am impressed by some of the previous forums also question how END PM400 it. Seem to have some of the information presented> I think when the backup is not the first thing END SAVLIB ah swap PM400 can we not support SAVACT parameters? : Em14:: em14:: em14: I go back and look up information to see what can be pondering the reasons why. . . : Mrgreen: Xuguopeng back in :2004-10 - 14 16:22:58 | SAVACT should be supported, but> PM400 the OBJ may have been the fact he ACTIVE backup is not very important to the integrity of the main I would like to know I have MONMSG CPF0000 Why can not ignore CPF3777? | Qingzhou back in :2004-10 - 14 18:25:29 | Guopeng, I carefully studied the afternoon to SAVACT parameters, a total of four: * NO * LIB, SYNCLIB * * SYSDFN, let me distinguish between their struggles to understand a Chen understand. : Em06:: em06:: em06: | [Color = red: e463fac271] [SAVACT understanding of the parameters again, and more IBMer confirmed that the following understanding, so as to avoid misleading the people. ] [/ Color: e463fac271] 1. * NO indicated that he did not approach the opening save active backup; 2. * LIB, SYNCLIB * * SYSDFN are directed at a number of LIB sometimes play a backup role, a single backup LIB, and * * LIB SYNCLIB little difference. 3. * LIB and * LIB SYNCLIB is back up multiple simultaneous use of a point-in-time backup to judge, and more than * LIB SYSDFN backup automatically when using multiple simultaneous point-in-time backup for judgement. * LIB and the SYNCLIB * What is the difference between? See below. 4. * LIB backup at the same time said that when the number of LIB, using> And * SYNCLIB backup at the same time that a number of LIB, is also using> 5. * LIB SYSDFN said that when a number of backup system uses a synchronous point-in-time backup sync, especially for the backup LIB between relativity. 6. Thus, if we want a number of active library backup success, select the parameters of the election should not * lib, and should choose * SYSDFN higher success rate, because * SYSDFN provides multiple synchronization time point to the current scanning system LIB state, for example, 17:00 for the first time a synchronous, 17:10 for the first two synchronization time, 17:20 for the first three synchronous point-in-time course at the same time we can also appropriate modifications save active wait time parameter increases Backup duration. 7. Thus, we can profoundly realized SAVACT parameters and save active wait time these two parameters to match the parameters of "on-line backup," the significance of the. Banking, insurance departments in the real-time data backup mechanism is particularly conspicuous, and in particular banks, often behind two parameters used to implement data backup (* SYNCLIB * SYSDFN), but having said that, due to the transaction data too pure SAVLIB simply can not meet the 24-hour> In addition, as I understand it, is a software PM400 LICPGM software, and not free of charge. V5R2 version of this LICPGM PT1 installed after 5722 will create several LIB, LIB [QPM4CON] is the preservation of this system OBJ, and the [QMPGDATA] This is the preservation of your LIB After PM400 system software performance analysis data obtained in pdf . In fact, you can do this backup [QMPGDATA] LIB can be, if really want to backup [QPM4CON], proposed SAVACT (* SYSDFN) or (* SYNCLIB) try. Michael9406 back in :2004-10 - 14 21:28:24 | We can ask the old Liu book. | Ibmas400 back in :2004-10 - 14 22:23:24 | We qingzhou> This posting answer very well, but is also very detailed, should be located fine! : M01: | Xuguopeng back in :2004-10 - 15 09:01:27 | I understand that, but still no direct answer to my question ah? | I asked why MONMSG CPF0000 can not ignore CPF3777? ? Zzzddd back in :2004-10 - 15 10:12:22 | Why MONMSG CPF0000 can ignore CPF3777? ? Which you seen the book? ? ? | Xuguopeng back in :2004-10 - 15 11:59:42 | Is not MONMSG CPF0000 can monitor all CPF * MSG? ? | Yoyoage back in :2004-10 - 15 20:59:09 | Yes, but you must declare monmsg cpf0000 keep up with the phrase. | Stephenxie2003 back in :2004-10-18 14:06:13 | Carefully read this, the analysis is a good ah! | Worth learning about! Common raise! :) Xuguopeng back in :2004-10-18 17:54:26 | [Quote: dd5ba7395d = "yoyoage"] can be, but you must declare monmsg cpf0000 keep up with the phrase. [/ Quote: dd5ba7395d] | Keep up with the DECLARE statement? Do not understand I just SAVLIB. . . . . . MONMSG MSGID (CPF0000) MONMSG between SAV and certainly no other statements to this point is some common sense, I I do not understand clearly that this can be ignored CPF * MSG can still reported a CPF3777. . . . : Em06: Yoyoage back in :2004-10-18 18:23:45 | Of course not declare statement> Expression of more precise, it is enforceable as a first language. :) | Qingzhou back in :2004-10-19 10:00:25 | [Quote: 7761a2692d = "yoyoage"] did not declare statements as of course should be the first procedure of the statement. | Expression of more precise, it is enforceable as a first language. :) [/ Quote: 7761a2692d] [Code: 1:7761 a2692d] The following *************** Beginning of data ***** 0001.00 /************************************************ ************/ 0002.00 / DAILY JOB ** ** / 0003.00 / PGM ID DOMINO_ONLINE ** ** / 0004.00 / ** PGM NAME DAILY DOMINO> 0005.00 /**---------------------------------------------- ----------**/ 0006.00 / PGM DESCRRIPTION ** ** / 0007.00 / ** ** / 0008.00 / ** CREATION DATE 04/10/14 ** / 0009.00 / PROGRAMMER NAME QINGZHOU ** ** / 0010.00 / ** UPDATE DATE ** / 0011.00 /************************************************ ************/ 0012.00 PGM 0013.00 0014.00 DCL VAR (& DAY) TYPE (* CHAR) LEN (4) 0015.00 0016.00 MONMSG MSGID (CPF0000) 0017.00 0018.00 CHGJOB OUTQ (QPRINT) 0019.00 0020.00 / * DOMINO> 0022.00 STRDOMSVR SVR (Domino_Server_Name) 0023.00 MONMSG MSGID (CPF0000) 0024.00 0025.00 / * OTHER SBSD START * / 0026.00 0027.00 QSYS / STRSBS SBSD (QINTER) 0028.00 MONMSG MSGID (CPF0000) 0029.00 0030.00 ENDPGM: ENDPGM The following End of data ***************************** *********** [/ Code: 1:7761 a2692d] In addition, guopeng, "MONMSG MSGID (CPF0000)" = "ignored all the CFP ****"???: em06:: em06:: em06: Xuguopeng back in :2004-10-19 10:57:25 | [Code: 1: d26d55ff9a] 0014.00 DCL VAR (& DAY) TYPE (* CHAR) LEN (4) | 0015.00 0016.00 MONMSG MSGID (CPF0000) [/ code: 1: d26d55ff9a] This is necessary? ? MONMSG CPF0000 Is not monitor all CPF beginning of the MSG? ? ? : Em14:: em14:: em14: Silver.lake back in :2004-10-19 11:27:28 | Beginning of the program | -- Program level MONMSG, monitor message sent by all of commands in the program (maximum of 100). Following the command -- Command level MONMSG, override a program-level MONMSG command If zeros are specified in either two or all four of the rightmost Positions, such as ppmm00, a generic message identifier is Specified. For example, if CPF0000 is specified, all the CPF Messages are monitored. Refer to the MONMSG> Xuguopeng back in :2004-10-19 12:45:47 |
